| 
         
          | A Public Policy 
            Statement |  Capital Punishment People are alarmed by the increase in crime, especially 
        violent crime. Some candidates for election at every level of government 
         and from both major political parties  have continued to 
        inject the issue of capital punishment into their campaigns as if it were 
        a solution to the crime problem. It is repugnant to us that public officials 
        would exploit our people's worst fears by pursuing state-sanctioned killing. The Board of Directors of the Queens Federation 
        of Churches affirms the sanctity of human life created by God and opposes 
        all efforts to restore the death penalty. We share with you our reasons: First: Advocates of the death penalty are in danger 
        of capitalizing on the widespread and understandable disaffection of the 
        citizenry with our criminal justice system by perpetuating an illusion: 
        that the death penalty will serve to deter crime. We find no evidence 
        for this belief either from past or recent history. In fact, the death 
        penalty would serve to retard the wheels of justice by adding to the law's 
        delay and by diverting attention away from the basic need for a strengthened 
        police force and reformed judicial system. Second: The spectacle of a people pulling the 
        lever or pressing the button of execution adds credibility to the threatening 
        conviction that human life itself has only derivative value. Legal killing 
        attacks our sense of the sacred worth of human life. Those who advocate 
        execution as a means of saving money are putting a dollar value on everyone's 
        life. Third: Advocates of the death penalty overlook 
        the historical reality that it has been an extension of a long tradition 
        of racism. The melancholy roll call of legal executions indicates that 
        a Black man has a much greater likelihood of death than a White man accused 
        of the same offense. Fourth: Advocates of the death penalty also overlook 
        the parallel reality that it is class legislation. Execution and poverty 
        go together. Fifth: Advocates of the death penalty have no 
        adequate answer to the awful possibility of human error. The question 
        of the guilt of Sacco and Vanzetti still smarts the eyes of justice in 
        America. Given the same evidence or lack of it would they have been convicted 
        had they been White, Anglo-Saxon, and Protestant? Would they have been 
        executed if convicted? Sixth: The death penalty denies the redemptive 
        possibility. There is simply no limit to what God can do with a human 
        life, no matter how great the alienation. The death penalty would say 
        'no' to God's grace revealed in Jesus Christ, as it would say 'no' to 
        humanity.   |